Unpopular Opinions

lesbian liberation = women's liberation = needs to focus on lesbian interests first and only


So what do Lesbians want and what they want not

 ....... 🤯

What they want, possibly:

 - The freedom to be cared for without to be exploited even after death
 - free rooms to live and work, free food and water and electricity
 - no need to work
 - female-only family, society/nation with own schools, health care, entertainment business, groups/cults for specific women....
 - Sensual portrayals of physical and spiritual love between two women or more (similar age) (sorry but why we should have just one woman, why not two or more....? competition with other lesbians? They can be friends too... )
 - validation of their existence without the need of state approval (no marriage concept like we see in this men world)
 - Freedom to never have children, idealization of childlesness
 - Freedom to eat vegan, animals can't be buyed anymore
 - Freedom to believe in lesbian-supporting religions (they need to be created by a woman)
 - Power to sue and erase the access males have over any female body
 - Power to erase (and castrate) male life and sue male-supporting women


So at the end we want a society that is antinatalistic and antispeciecistic, vulva-centric. Antipatriarchal.

tbh I don't like males.
What I don't like about males is that they lie and fake history or show their illness/ideocies as something holy, ideal.

We have on this planet a history of male violence, unbelievable crimes against female animals, women, girls.

BUT watch tv in a 'progressiv' nation like denmark or similar, and you see male violence all day long, year after year. These stories they tell, are idealizations of their ill parasitical character and behavior. They produce these stories in a fantasy format for children, teens and adults. I saw over a  month different cartoons and they are really mostly the same.
It's no wonder that girls, women get depressed when they see these stupid stories, while they are surroundet by a slave and male-supporter (the mother, or any other female) and the rapist (husband, or any other male around).

There are zero alternatives that can be looked at (The Owl House doesn't come anymore and the story was never really antimen). There is zero female friendship.

I am so sorry for all these girls that grew with this. I wish I could create my own multimedia business to give them hope. To give them at least in the fantasy female friendship or in reality a good workplace for the future. They should have visions and should know what is good and what not. How they can support/protect other females.

Sadly it's hard to create this alternative. If I ever finish my comics I bet most girls and women never see it. It will not become like Spiderman, cartoon after cartoon comes out for the franchise. Maybe it will be banned at a whole because it shows misandrism and that female friendship is stronger than any male army ever.

Look how they censor pro-abortion storytelling or pressure filmakers to create depressing lesbian stories instead of supportive ones that idealize lesbianism and female friendship or violence against males.

And these stupid men pretend to be for "free speech" and against 'censorship' but the truth is they just want the freedom to insult and exploit female bodies (porn).

They control what we get to see. My childhood and teens where influenced by this malemedia shit. I always was hungry for female friendship in these stories but they never show any. Today it's the same. The only escape for me as a teen was shoujo-ai manga. Today some lgbt comics. This is very bad, if you know that shoujo-ai and lgbt comics aren't really supporting ff for ff.

Same shit everywhere and I can't draw how I want. I could vomit all the time, because of how disgusting this society is. Maybe I go and push a knife in the neck of the next male stranger. They deserve to die in a very brutal way, and I deserve to make my visions a reality. I want revenge and female friendship.

Ew. On the other l chat is a thread full with males and handmaidens. Called "What are your thoughts on same-sex pregnancies amongst humans couples (has been accomplished in mice)?"

Some commenters don't hide their hate against childless lesbians that see in every procreation/pregnancy unethic/a crime and in childlesness a privilege and luck every female should be able to have (so yea real lesbians). A lesbian never wants to create another counsciousness because it is always unethical to do so. Simple as that. These new animals (humans are animals too) cannot give any consent to be born and they will face suffering, pain recreate it and die if they start to exist. The nuclear family, evil as it is, would just be reproduced. No real lesbian want's this.

Also, which lesbian wants sperm in her???? Or wants to use another woman's organs for creating offspring.... Hello patriarchy supporting bihet lol.

It's always so cringe how ill pronatalists are. Such disgusting parasites (and males are always pronatalists, they spread their shit everywhere) spread lies even on a lesbian board wtf. Their sperm, lies and their whole bodies should be burned.

Also the stupid handmaidens do really take care of the biological clock myth. They only seem to think about getting raped/impregnated or get a slave to finally breed. What else are they other than evil incubator-puppets... I won't give them my eggs, nor my womb, nor my blood. I don't support their ill minds, they are whole different creatures.

I stay childless and if someone wants to take this away from me I rather kill those shitty parasites. No one has the right to use me or other women or any other female body for such unethical shit that pregnancy is.

These men and women that do experiments on mouses or rats or any other female animals are ill and should be painful erased from this planet soon.

Wanting artifical dick while sleeping with your girlfriend doesn't make any of you a bihet.
A bihet is simply a woman that want's children or sees nothing unnatural in procreation and will move back and forward into men for this. This really is not the behavior of a lesbian.

Lesbians do masturbation or nothing at all until they can have a girlfriend and that's it.

The artifical dick is just a part of a roleplay. The most arousing part is, when the artifical dick is taken off and you can rub your real body parts, the vulva and breasts and fingers on each other, and hug each other.
You have the security with a woman that you aren't impregnated. And rape/domestic violence is also reduced (sadly it doesn't vanish).

Compare this to het-intercourse. I cannot recommend to trust even vasectomized men and they can't simply take their ill prick off. It's a part of them like the little parasites and toxins in their otherwise barren body. They want to spread their illness everywhere, because males are parasites and if we can we should reduce/exterminate them to get better life circumstances.

Women's bodies don't produce sperm, they are cleaner and holy from the beginning of their existence. The only problem they have is not their body, it's the environment with so many parasites around them.

You can be sure a woman that calls herself antinatalistic and has a husband or friend or whatever fcker is 100% not antinatalistic and not a lesbian. A woman that has a girlfriend but wants children is not a lesbian, because she want's sperm in her or in her girlfriend or want's to exploit another woman for her egoistical misogynistic perversion. Even when same-sex cells can reproduce in the future, this technology will be in the hands of men and the children cannot give any consent. Also if she reproduces sons, instead of copies of herself, she produces the next rapists. Nothing changes, it's unethical.

And Unethic is 100% not what a lesbian wants. Creating something that cannot give any consent is typicall patriarchal, parasitic behavior.
Lesbianism and Celebacy, and Antispeciecism/Veganism are practical Antinatalism, they are worth to be supported.
What you choose does matter.

Any language can sound beautiful but it depends on the speaker.

straight women never are very smart no matter where you look.
They have so many chances to kill their husband, friend but they rather kill themselves and let a rapist alive. They are more like prostituted women, that don't have any wishes. They are rotten and doesn't help anybody but dick with their existence. What they lack is COURAGE.

My advice is to show courage and erase them with their stupid scrotes.

Sheila Jeffreys had some good points. For example in this paper
'The Transgendering of Children Gender Eugnics''
https://sheila-jeffreys.com/the-transgendering-of-childrengender-eugenics/

I also was caged away in mental hospitals, because I am a poor woman that stopped going to school (i was bullied and then they forced me into mental hospitals but not the bullies) and no one feels the need to care for women like me. I know the history and purpose of psychology (it's open on the web) and I am anti-psychology/anti-psychiatry because of it and my life experience plus what I saw and could hear by other women, some lesbians.

But many 'women' that show their despise against the 'sterilization of children' (transgender) or against female doctors or women that castrate their sons are right-wing males in rl OR mothers of sons or want to be mothers of sons and want a husband or they have one.

Such women are right-wing and not radical feminists - rw and rf is a BIG difference. These RW Women are breeders and have only this dick-focused and pronatalistic interest. They want grandchildren and healthy sons that develope to rapists and murderers. These sons will steal our living rooms and destroy our existence (also they can at anytime choose to say they are girls...).

Radical Feminism supports the castration of sons and supports antinatalism (in forms of surgical castration and lesbianism). RF always fights against surrogacy also they fight against the whole exploitation of females and want to give us MORE not less territory.

So beware whom you follow. The anti-trannytrain drives next to the trannytrain. I never label myself as 'gender critical' because it's so filled with women that want to support dick.

I feel like Julie Bindel is okay, not full99% but okay, even if she is 'just' a woman that has a big fear against males and so she should be called a ex-het feminist. I prefer them than typical hets that support child rapists. Males are horrible and her fear is a logical reaction to her survival. I read also many bad things about males and I see how they shit over us and other female animals every day.
I can live without them but not without women that care for me and other vulnerable females. Fear against males can lead to lesbian separatism, our own rooms, businesses, villages, schools and shopping rooms, legends, language and so on and to more radical activities that erase male life. It can lead to a stronger bond between women.

Also we should not generalize 'political lesbians'. Some sound logical and not lesbophobic. They say to women: create a environment where women can choose women, support women not males, let males starve. This is a good message imo.

Maybe they shouldn't call themselve lesbians, but no one should imo, because sadly it's a porngenre and used as a slur. It's better they call themselve ex-het feminists. They had a het past and now they rebell against dick. They choose to fight for more power for women and try to exclude males from their life. For me these women start to gossip against the rape culture/sons and puppets that support it, they start to love themselve and other women too, they woke up, want to give other women a choice to choose women and that's good.

btw. not all of 'polilezzes' had a het past. Maybe we and they should call them never-het feminists in that case. The never-het feminists and ex-het feminists can be friends imo.

in the other l board is a thread called "If the world had the virus that only attacked gene XY" interesting read but one page was trolled by a incel or other pervert man. He posted a picture of infant feets and asked how women would reproduce then and which women would make the "hard work" then. Lol like we would care. Men are so disgusting pieces of shit. I bet if they died out and only females are alive every society would be a better place and not only the human societies. Many would have simply no interest to reproduce and build a antinatalistic and vegan environment, that don't need men's arms to get things done and where they help each other and not compete. All the pedophilic (pronatalist) shit and the stupid "hard work" comes from men/men environment only. Men WANT to work hard, because they have nothing other to do in their life than play rapist/soldier or play on their cars and they build a toxic environment after what they want but no one needs. Without them it would be easy to live and healthy. There will be no capitalism anymore.

I just can support the wish that men die out soon, because I and all women can then be what we really are and can do what benefits us. Also many girls would be protected against rape/prostitution.

Or I just wonder what feels a boy if his mother tells him he is just a product out of rape, by a ugly man and a ugly male society that forced her to give birth to his body. She would not wash him and don't care what happens with him if he goes into a shelther or whatever.

Would this be cruel to him or do boys feel nothing?
I think he would be fast over it. Boys aren't damaged by this reality. They ARE and grow to be the monsters that raped the girl/woman who could not escape his existence and then as a rape survivor the mother can tell him this. When boys become teen or adult males they are all supportive towards fathers that also don't really care for them but in the best way see them as their food soldiers or younger selves. What really bonds them is they share one monstrosity, a parasitic body with mostly a similar predatory counsciousness that is 100% disconnected to anything female=ethic.
Bet many men simply see in women nothing other than a door (a host) to get more of themselve, so they can create bigger weapons, skyscrapers and slavery businesess, rape more and more. That's all what they are.


It's ill that natur let such things exist but it shows that this planet isn't smart and doesn't care about real individuals. The beings that survive/reproduce here are all violent ill and self-eating shits that create the biggest lies. They kill and are killed someday. It happens without any higher sense.

Guest wrote:
   ---Do you want to live in a matriarchal community, with lesbians in your age group or all age groups, where no men (or trans*women) are allowed?

   I don't live in one of these communities... so this is not an advertisement... I'm just curious if young lesbians under 50 want to live in these communities.

Wow I wish for a own village and if I got my own room, privacy and no noise that would be good. I need some care, if they could bring me food and so on this would be a better life than what I got here in a norMALE town. It's sad and boring also dangerous here. The women here are all strangers, fem, I can't connect with because they are so unempathical. I know that community women can have drama but I guess they are better than what I found in male places. I would be happy to get some access to music production, drawing or good-to-know knowledge and such things. Most important is that I get some women that help me and a place where I didn't need to get money to get what I need for my survival and good wellbeing.

^ I would be interested in a comic/graphic novel or text book that would develope ideas and explanations how such a community could be build. Maybe a guide even, especially for women that don't know how to get with women along. Personally I want a own place but have no women with same interests. I am in the corner 'introvert' 'social arkward' 'mental ill' 'weak'. In such normale places I also feel attacked by boys/men and women that fit in. I can get homeless here, for a women's village I would wish no women get's homeless there.


But don't recommend Lesbian Nation the author was a woman with a son.

It is hard to understand why active euthanasia is made so difficult in many countries. It only makes sense if you know that you live in a patriarchal society. Men want to decide when women die and why.

As a woman, I want to decide for myself and above all I don't want to have people around me because I know that most people, including family members, coldly take advantage of situations in which you are in need of help. I would recommend everyone if possible to look for a room (can also be a forest) where you have your quiet peace and the risk is not so high that your plans or corpse will be discovered. If you're not careful, a necrophiliac will come around the corner. Morticians are also mostly necrophiles. I don't want to have anything to do with them even after death. But women are not protected from men, neither alive nor dead. So many organ trafficking goes on - the organs are from girls and women can bet they where murdered. Again just shows how disgusting this planet is.

I took the best I could find in this planet to make a new -ism of it: Antipatriarchalism

It's for everyone obvious that these mainstream women in the entertainment industry are filthy antifeministic f/ckflesh BUT we should always coordinate the hate towards men, because without men no girl ever would become a postituted entertainment sl/t that panders to dick. Miley Cyrus is what men (rapists) made of her, that is what makes me and few other women here sad and angry, because we want to see female bodies as we see them: worthful not whoreful.

Miley Cyrus can be rescued, any prostituted woman and girl can this, if she gets access to better people around her and a environment where men have nothing to say in life.

As a victim of course I don't see the appeal of Victimblaming. Obviously men do this but I saw this often in mothers. They defend the males with silence or lies. The daughter or stranger girl is for them mentaly ill or she lured him into raping her.

Such mothers are pieces of trash. Sadly I guess they aren't the minority.

Motherhood more often than less damages the ethical character a woman can have.

A better story than the patriarchal trashmovies The Lion King is
Thyke the vegetarian lioness. I'm glad I found this story because it's very sad, but not without heart. Her mother attacked her as a child. Obviously because her mother didn't want her daughter to have to put up with the same crap from men. Her mother was abducted, imprisoned and raped, otherwise she would not give birth to children in such an environment. Before Thyke, she always successfully killed her children.
She was a rare case of a good mother. I hope Thyke knew that her mother loved her. Also Thyke was friends with, a sheep and a chicken, on the farm. The ones who saved her life are not the good guys. I don't think her life was much better than that of her wild sisters. All these mammals will be hurt by others one day. Life isn't harmonic.

It would probably have been quite good if female homosexuality had been recognized as an illness by the welfare states in order to receive state benefits. I see this also worth to try for 2024 and later.

A better non-lesbophobic correct but unfortunately almost impossible step would be to receive state benefits because of centuries of misogyny. Females deserve justice and are without it since centuries.
But men's states will not recognize this, they prefer to ignore and lie about the harm they create, even now. Which means a revolution is first needed. Women need to learn how to use violence. We are worthful enough to take and build or own territory.

I know many prostituted/workingslaves women are full with toxic air inside and caged like cattle in dickish environments. But I hope they can understand what I want.

I maybe find a way to clean the air inside of them and give us all a world free of men.